Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Monopoli untuk Materi Vektor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61193/jidr.v1i2.20Abstrak
The purpose of this study is to develop media education based on monopoly games as a viable medium to help mathematics learning in high school. The research method used is ADDIE (Analyze, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation). The results showed that this media education can increase student interest in learning and assist teachers in providing cognitive value and activeness. So, it can be concluded that the media education of mathematical monopoly for vector material is feasible to use.
Referensi
Agustinus, J. (2013). Phenomoenology study on financial performance and management accountability of special autonomy funds allocated for education at the province of Papua, Indonesia. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business Vol. 15(1).
Ali, S. U. (2016). ESP teacher education model in Indonesian context. EDUKASI, Vol. 13 (2).
Astawa, I. B. M. (2015). Education reform in the era of regional autonomy entering the global era. Media Komunikasi Geografi Vol. 16(2).
Azizah, N. (2013). Penerapan media monopoli untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran IPA di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Vol. 1 (2), 1-12.
Bayar, A. (2014). The components of effective professional development activities in terms of teachers' perspective. Online Submission Vol. 6 (2), 319-327.
Beswick, K. (2014). What teachers’ want: Identifying mathematics teachers’ professional learning needs. The Mathematics Enthusiast Vol. 11 (1), 83-108.
Cheng, L. I., Basu, A., & Goebel, R. (2009). Interactive multimedia for adaptive online education. IEEE MultiMedia Vol. 16 (1), 16-25.
Dirgayasa, I. W. (2014). Survey of English teaching and learning process in maritme education and training in Indonesia: A case study in private MET in Indonesia. English Language Teaching Vol. 7 (7), 111-119.
Divjak, B., & Tomić, D. (2011). The impact of game-based learning on the achievement of learning goals and motivation for learning mathematics-literature review. Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences Vol. 35 (1), 15-30.
Doriza, S., Purwanto, D. A., & Maulida, E. (2013). Fiscal decentralization and disparity of access to primary education in Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Vol. 14 (2), 223-233.
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight assessment Vol. 2007 (1), 1-23.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D. L. (2012). The early prevention of mathematics difficulty: Its power and limitations. Journal of learning disabilities Vol. 45 (3), 257-269.
Godino, J. D., Font, V., Wilhelmi, M. R., & Lurduy, O. (2011). Why is the learning of elementary arithmetic concepts difficult? Semiotic tools for understanding the nature of mathematical objects. Educational Studies in Mathematics Vol. 77 (2-3), 247-265.
Guskey, T. R. (2009). Closing the knowledge gap on effective professional development. Educational horizons Vol. 87 (4), 224-233.
Handayani, M. (2019). Peningkatan hasil belajar dan motivasi belajar siswa sekolah dasar melalui media pembelajaran monopoli matematika (Monotika). Jurnal Mathematic Paedagogic Vol. 4 (1), 23-32.
Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2010). Generalizations about using value-added measures of teacher quality. American Economic Review Vol. 100 (2), 267-71.
Kharisma, B., & Pirmana, V. (2013). The role of government on education quality and its provision: The case of public junior secondary school among provinces in Indonesia. European Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 37 (2), 259-270.
Kritzer, K. L. (2009). Barely started and already left behind: A descriptive analysis of the mathematics ability demonstrated by young deaf children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education Vol. 14 (4), 409-421.
Lewis, B. D., & Pattinasarany, D. (2009). Determining citizen satisfaction with local public education in Indonesia: The significance of actual service quality and governance conditions. Growth and Change Vol. 40 (1), 85-115.
Mailani, E. (2018). Upaya meningkatkan hasil belajar matematika pada materi pecahan melalui permainan monopoli pecahan. Jurnal Handayani PGSD FIP Unimed Vol. 4 (1).
Newman-Gonchar, R., Clarke, B., & Gersten, R. (2009). A summary of nine key studies: multi-tier intervention and response to interventions for students struggling in mathematics. Center on Instruction.
Nusir, S., Alsmadi, I., Al-Kabi, M., & Sharadgah, F. (2012). Studying the impact of using multimedia interactive programs at children ability to learn basic math skills. Acta Didactica Napocensia, Vol. 5 (2), 17-32.
Pareto, L., Schwartz, D. L., & Svensson, L. (2009, July). Learning by guiding a teachable agent to play an educational game. AIED, 662-664.
Pareto, L., Arvemo, T., Dahl, Y., Haake, M., & Gulz, A. (2011, June). A teachable-agent arithmetic game’s effects on mathematics understanding, attitude and self-efficacy. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 247-255).
Pradipta, D. A. (2015). Pengembangan game edukatif Monolita sebagai media pembelajaran matematika siswa SMP kelas VII. Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pesantren Tinggi Darul Ulum.
Prayogo, B. A. (2017). Permainan monopoli sebagai media pembelajaran matematika. Joyful Learning Journal Vol. 6 (4), 228-233.
Purbani, W. (2013). Equity in the classroom: The system and improvement of inclusive schools in Yogyakarta, Indonesia (a case study). US-China Education Review Vol 3 (7), 507-518.
Ramdhani, N., & Ancok, D. (2013). Educational innovations for empowering teachers in acomplishing better education in Indonesia. Global Innovators Conference Vol. 2013 (2), 11.
Retnawati, H., Kartowagiran, B., Arlinwibowo, J., & Sulistyaningsih, E. (2017). Why are the mathematics national examination items difficult and what is teachers’ strategy to overcome it? International Journal of Instruction Vol. 10 (3), 257-276.
Rosser, A., & Joshi, A. (2013). From user fees to fee free: The politics of realising universal free basic education in Indonesia. The Journal of Development Studies Vol. 49 (2), 175-189.
Sangadji, S. (2016). Implementation of cooperative learning with group investigation model to improve learning achievement of vocational school students in Indonesia. International Journal of Learning & Development Vol. 6 (1), 91-103.
Senk, S. L., Tatto, M. T., Reckase, M., Rowley, G., Peck, R., & Bankov, K. (2012). Knowledge of future primary teachers for teaching mathematics: An international comparative study. Zdm Vol. 44 (3), 307-324.
Setiawan, B., Innatesari, D. K., Sabtiawan, W. B., & Sudarmin, S. (2017). The development of local wisdom-based natural science module to improve science literation of students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia Vol. 6 (1).
Soviawati, E. (2011). Pendekatan matematika realistik (PMR) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berfikir siswa di tingkat sekolah dasar. Jurnal Edisi Khusus Vol. 2 (2), 79-85.
Sulisworo, D. (2016). The contribution of the education system quality to improve the nation's competitiveness of Indonesia. Journal of Education and Learning Vol. 10 (2), 127-138.
Sullivan, P., Askew, M., Cheeseman, J., Clarke, D., Mornane, A., Roche, A., & Walker, N. (2015). Supporting teachers in structuring mathematics lessons involving challenging tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education Vol. 18 (2), 123-140.
Suyanto, S. (2017, August). A reflection on the implementation of a new curriculum in Indonesia: A crucial problem on school readiness. AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1868 (1).
Wachira, P., & Keengwe, J. (2011). Technology integration barriers: Urban school mathematics teachers’ perspectives. Journal of science education and technology Vol. 20 (1), 17-25.
Waluya, S. B., & Mariani, S. (2016, February). Mathematics literacy on problem based learning with Indonesian realistic mathematics education approach assisted e-learning Edmodo. Journal of Physics: Conference Series Vol. 693 (1).
Yuwono, G. I., & Harbon, L. (2010). English teacher professionalism and professional development: Some common issues in Indonesia. Asian EFL Journal Vol. 12 (3), 145-163.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2021 Journal of Instructional Development Research
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
